• 当前位置:学术研究首页 >> 课题研究 >>
  • 2008ADA-Advance study
  •  2008-07-14 08:35:36  作者:ery  来源:  浏览次数:0  网友评论0
  • The members of the Writing Committee of the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) Collaborative Group are listed in the Appendix. This article (10.1056/NEJMoa0802987) was published at www.nejm.org on June 6, 2008. It will appear in the June 12 issue of the Journal.

    BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately. RESULTS: After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.) Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.

    PMID: 18539916 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

    ADVANCE的三个结果:第一是强化血糖控制可以减少严重的糖尿病并发症特别是可以防止新发生的和原有的肾病加重。第二:没有任何证据能够证明强化治疗增加任何原因和心血管的死亡。第三与以往所预测的同样强化治疗增加严重低血糖事件的发生,所有的严重低血糖事件是强化治疗组0.7%,非强化治疗组0.4%
  • 本文引用地址:http://www.endoz2.com.cn/research/2008/0714/content_286.htm
  • 责任编辑:ery
  • 发表评论】 【加入收藏】 【告诉好友】 【打印本页】 【关闭窗口】 【返回顶部
  • 发表评论
  • 评分: 1 2 3 4 5

        
  • ·请遵守《互联网电子公告服务管理规定》及中华人民共和国其他各项有关法律法规。
  • ·严禁发表危害国家安全、损害国家利益、破坏民族团结、破坏国家宗教政策、破坏社会稳定、侮辱、诽谤、教唆、淫秽等内容 。
  • ·用户需对自己在使用本站服务过程中的行为承担法律责任(直接或间接导致的)。
  • ·本站管理员有权保留或删除评论内容。